A comparison of alveolar ridge mucosa thickness in completely edentulous patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this cross-sectional clinical study was to determine and compare alveolar ridge mucosa thickness at crestal, buccal, and lingual locations of the maxillary and mandibular arches in completely edentulous patients using a dedicated, ultrasonic gingival scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight completely edentulous subjects were included in the study. In each subject, soft tissue thickness was measured at 28 sites of the edentulous ridge by a single calibrated examiner. Intra-observer reliability was calculated with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients by measuring 10 subjects twice, after 1 week. Measurements (mm) were taken at the buccal, lingual, and crestal aspects of the ridge with a dedicated ultrasonic scanner. Repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-tests were used to compare the mean buccal, lingual, and crestal soft tissue thicknesses at each site. The Generalized Estimating Equations model was used to study the effects of age, sex, and race. Confidence level was set to 95%. RESULTS: Mean tissue thickness ranged from 0.96  to 1.98 mm with a mean of 1.63 ± 0.25 mm. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were > 0.97. No significant differences between buccal, crestal, and lingual sites were noted for the mandibular arch as well as at 4 sites on the maxillary arch (maxillary right second molar, maxillary right canine, maxillary left first premolar, maxillary left second molar). However, significant differences in soft tissue thickness were noted for all remaining maxillary sites. Race was found to be positively correlated with tissue thickness, with Black individuals showing a significantly greater thickness than White individuals at 4 sites (maxillary right first molar, maxillary left canine, mandibular right second premolar, mandibular right first molar). Age was found to be positively correlated with tissue thickness at 4 sites (maxillary left central incisor, maxillary left first molar, maxillary left second molar, mandibular left second premolar) and negatively correlated at 2 sites (mandibular right canine, mandibular right second molar). Female sex was positively (maxillary left second premolar, maxillary left second molar) and negatively (mandibular right canine) correlated, respectively, with tissue thickness at 3 sites. When data for anterior and posterior sites were respectively pooled, tissue thickness was significantly less at anterior sextant lingual and crestal sites, while no difference was seen for buccal sites. CONCLUSION: Statistically significant differences for alveolar ridge mucosa thickness were found at several sites in the maxilla and between anterior and posterior sextants for lingual and crestal sites in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Tissue thickness differences were also noted for race with Black individuals showing greater tissue thickness at some sites. Age and sex did not show a clear effect on tissue thickness. Recorded differences in tissue thickness were however small and appear of uncertain clinical significance.

Reverse scan body: The scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of different scan patterns on the fit of implant-supported complete-arch prototype prostheses fabricated via a complete digital extraoral protocol with a reverse scan body. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mandibular cast with four multi-unit abutment (MUA) implant analogs with adequate antero-posterior spread served as the reference cast, simulating a common clinical patient situation, and a polymethylmethacrylate interim screw-retained prosthesis was fabricated on it. Novel reverse scan bodies were connected to the interim prosthesis on the intaglio of the MUA abutments and extraoral scanning was performed with a white light intraoral scanner (TRIOS 4; 3 shape) and three different scan patterns: starting from the occlusal surface of the interim prosthesis (O-group), starting from the intaglio (I-group), and helix pattern (H-group).  The resulting STL files from the three groups were then imported to computer-aided design (CAD) software and after the digital design, the STL files were exported to a computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) milling machine which generated a total of 15 CAD-CAM milled prototype prostheses per group. Two clinicians assessed the fit of each digitally fabricated prototype prosthesis on the reference cast, utilizing the screw-resistance test and radiographic evaluation. Fisher's exact test was used to test the difference between the three groups, and Cohen's k-score was used to assess the inter-examiner agreement. RESULTS: Out of the three different groups, the O-group scan pattern led to 100% prosthesis fit, while the prototype prostheses generated from I- and H-groups had 80% and 53% fit, respectively. The results were statistically significant (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Occlusal scan pattern leads to fitting milled prototype prostheses after extraoral scanning with reverse scan bodies without intraoral implant data acquisition.

Effect of implant angulation and patrice on the retention of overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro study.

PURPOSE: To test the retention of two different overdenture attachment matrices and straight abutments when implants are placed at 0-, 15-, and 30-degree diverging angulations as well as the retention of 15-degree-angled abutments to correct the overall angulation to 0-degrees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Matching aluminum blocks were machined to incorporate two dental implants at 0-degree, 15-degree, and 30-degree relative angulations and overdenture attachments to simulate a two-implant overdenture. At 0-degree, 15-degree, and 30-degree implant angulation, straight abutments were studied. At 30-degree implant angulation, an additional group was compared utilizing 15-degree angulated abutments that corrected the overall implant angulation to 0-degrees. A custom-designed testing apparatus that allowed automated insertion and removal of the simulated overdenture was designed, with three independent testing stations, each consisting of one simulated arch and one simulated overdenture base. The baseline and residual retention forces after 30,000 dislodging cycles of the simulated overdenture were measured. One-way ANOVA was used to compare retention differences among different color patrices within the 0-, 15-, and 30-degree implant angulation groups followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. Two sample t-tests were used to compare 0-degree versus 15-degree implant groups with straight abutments and 30-degree implant groups with straight abutments versus 30-degree implant groups with angulated abutments. RESULTS: Regardless of implant angulation or abutment correction, the change in retention exhibited by the Novaloc system after testing was not statistically significant for all patrice types (p > 0.05); however, the change in retention exhibited by the Locator system was statistically significant for the tested group (p = 0.0272). In both the Novaloc and Locator systems, the baseline and final retention values provided by the different patrices were significantly different except for the white and green Novaloc patrices in the 15-degree divergent implant group which did not meet the specified level of significance (p = 0.0776). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, implant angulations upto 15 degrees do not affect differential change in retention of Novaloc patrices. There is no difference between Novaloc white inserts (light retention value) and green inserts (strong retention values) when implants diverge upto 15 degrees. When Novaloc straight abutments were placed on implants diverging by 30 degrees, blue extra-strong retention inserts outperformed yellow medium retention inserts by maintaining a higher retention value after 30,000 cycles. When utilizing Novaloc 15-degree angulated abutments that correct the overall implant angulation to zero degrees, the red light retentive patrice provides steady retention. Finally, the Locator-green patrice system provides greater retention than the comparable Novaloc-blue patrice combination; however, it also loses more retention after 30,000 cycles.

Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: A prospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: This prospective clinical study evaluated and compared the marginal and internal fit of crowns fabricated with an analog workflow and three different computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five participants in need of a single complete-coverage molar or premolar crown were recruited in the study. Twenty-two completed the study, and three participants dropped out. Teeth were prepared according to a standardized protocol by one operator. For each participant, one final impression was made with polyether material (PP) and three intraoral scanners: CEREC Omnicam (C), Planmeca Planscan (PM), and True Definition (TR). For the PP group, crowns were fabricated with a pressable lithium disilicate ceramic, whereas for the other three groups (C, PM, and TR), crowns were designed and milled with dedicated CAD-CAM systems and materials. Marginal (vertical and horizontal) and internal discrepancies between the crowns and tooth preparation were measured at various locations with digital superimposition software. Data was analyzed for normality with Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests and then compared with one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Mean vertical marginal gap values were 92.18 ± 141.41 µm (PP), 150.12 ± 138.06 µm (C), 129.07 ± 109.96 µm (PM), and 135.09 ± 112.03 µm (TR). PP group had statistically significantly smaller vertical marginal discrepancy (p = 0.001) than all other groups, whereas no significant difference was detected among the three CAD-CAM systems (C, PM, and TR). Horizontal marginal discrepancies were 104.93 ± 111.96 µm (PP), 89.49 ± 119.66 µm (C), 113.36 ± 128.49 µm (PM), and 136.39 ± 142.52 µm (TR). A significant difference was detected only between C and TR (p < 0.0001). Values for the internal fit were 128.40 ± 49.31µm (PP), 190.70 ± 69.79µm (C), 146.30 ± 57.70 µm (PM), and 168.20 ± 86.67 µm (TR). The PP group had a statistically significant smaller internal discrepancy than C (p < 0.0001) and TR groups (p = 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found compared to the PM group. CONCLUSION: Posterior crowns fabricated with CAD-CAM systems showed vertical margin discrepancy greater than 120 µm. Only crowns fabricated with the conventional methodology had vertical margins below 100 µm. Horizontal marginal discrepancy was different among all groups, and only CEREC CAD-CAM was below 100 µm. Internal discrepancy was less for crowns fabricated with an analog workflow.

Reverse scan body: A complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of fit of prosthesis prototypes fabricated via a complete digital workflow protocol with a reverse scan body skipping intraoral scanning for implant data acquisition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary stone cast with four multiunit abutment implant analogs (Screw-Retained Abutments, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) with adequate anteroposterior spread simulated a common clinical patient situation. This stone cast served as the master cast and an interim screw-retained prosthesis was fabricated on it. Novel reverse scan bodies were connected to the interim prosthesis, and extraoral scanning was performed with a white light intraoral scanner. The produced standard tessellation language (STL) files were then imported to computer-assisted design software and after the digital design, the STL file was exported to a computer-assisted machining milling machine and a three-dimensional (3D) printer to produce a total of 50 milled and 50 printed fixed complete denture prototypes, respectively. Two clinicians assessed the accuracy of fit of each digitally fabricated prosthesis prototype on the master cast, utilizing the screw-resistance test and radiographic evaluation. Out of the 100 prototypes, 94% (94/100) were fitting accurately. Fisher's exact test was used to test the difference among the groups. The test revealed statistically significant results (p = 0.027). RESULTS: Out of the 50 digitally fabricated milled prosthesis prototypes, 50 (100%) presented with accurate fit under in vitro assessment. Out of the 50 digitally fabricated 3D printed prototypes, 44 (88%) presented with accurate fit under in vitro assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Accurately fitting digitally fabricated prosthesis prototypes can be milled after extraoral scanning with reverse scan bodies without intraoral implant data acquisition.

Insertion and removal torque of dental implants placed using different drilling protocols: An experimental study on artificial bone substitutes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to measure the insertion and removal torque values of dental implant replicas inserted into artificial bone blocks using different surgical burs and drilling protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four types of artificial, polyurethane bone blocks were used with different thicknesses (1 and 2 mm) and densities (soft-1 mm, soft-2 mm, dense-1 mm, and dense-2 mm) of the simulated cortical and cancellous bone, respectively. Each bone construct was drilled with Straumann and Densah drills in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions for a total of 16 experimental conditions. For every scenario, 38 implant replicas were inserted and then removed after 1 min. Outcomes of interest were the insertion and removal torque values which were recorded by a torque meter. ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests were used to assess differences across each combination of drill, direction, and bone type. RESULTS: Densah counterclockwise registered statistically greater values for both insertion and removal torque, followed by Densah clockwise, Straumann counterclockwise, and Straumann clockwise. Increasing insertion and removal torque values were progressively reported for bone type (soft-1 mm, dense-1 mm, soft-2 mm, and dense-2 mm). The mean values of insertion and removal torque were significantly different (p < 0.05) across the four bone types, different burs, and with the two drilling modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Densah bur resulted in significantly greater values of torque compared to the Straumann drills for all the experimental conditions. The thickness of the cortical layer and the counterclockwise drilling direction play a significant role in determining the implant insertion torque.

Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with Double Digital Scanning: Accuracy of Fit Assessment.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a complete digital workflow protocol for fabrication of printed prosthesis prototypes for maxillary immediate loading treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary stone cast with 4 abutment-level implant analogs with adequate antero-posterior spread was fabricated. This stone cast served as a reference cast and a zirconia prosthesis was also fabricated to serve as an interim prosthesis. Double digital scanning was used for digital scans of the reference cast and the interim prosthesis, respectively. An intraoral scanner (TRIOS® 3) was used to capture the standard tessellation language (STL) files. These STL files were then imported to computer-aided design (CAD) software (Exocad DentalCAD) and superimposed into a final design STL file that was exported to 3 different (Form 3b+, Carbon M2, Sprintray Pro95) three-dimensional (3D) printers to produce a total of 90 printed prototypes (n = 30 from each 3D printer). Two blinded clinicians assessed the accuracy of fit of each digitally fabricated prosthesis prototype on the reference cast, utilizing the screw-resistance test and radiographs. The Fisher's exact test was used to test the difference between the groups. RESULTS: Out of the 90 digitally fabricated prototypes, 86 (95.6%) presented with accurate fit. The accuracy of fit ranged from 87% (26/30) for Sprintray Pro95 to 100% (30/30) for the Form 3b+ and M2 Carbon groups. CONCLUSIONS: Digitally fabricated prosthesis prototypes can be generated with a complete digital workflow leading to clinically acceptable fit, while reducing the number of appointments and treatment time. The 3D printer had an effect on the accuracy of prosthesis prototype fit.

Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of comparative clinical studies assessing the accuracy of full-arch digital scans versus conventional implant impressions. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the three-dimensional (3D) deviations between full-arch digital scans and conventional implant impressions for edentulous maxillae and mandibles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (36 edentulous jaws) were treated with one-piece, screw-retained implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs). Twenty-one jaws were maxillary, and 15 were mandibular. Full-arch conventional impressions and intraoral digital scans with scan bodies and an intraoral scanner had been taken during the impression phase. Following verification of the conventional stone casts, the casts were digitized. The generated standard tessellation language (STL) files from both impression techniques were merged and analyzed with reverse engineering software. The primary aim was to evaluate the accuracy between conventional and digital full-arch scans, while the effect of the edentulous jaw in 3D accuracy was the secondary aim. RESULTS: The cumulative 3D (mean ± SD) deviations between virtual casts from intraoral full-arch digital scans and digitized stone casts generated from conventional implant impressions were found to be 88 ±24 µm. In the maxillary group, the mean ± SD 3D deviation was 85 ±25 µm, compared to 92 ±23 µm for the mandibular group (p = 0.444). CONCLUSION: The 3D implant deviations found between the full-arch digital and conventional impressions lie within the clinically acceptable threshold. No statistically significant difference was identified between maxillary and mandibular jaws in terms of 3D deviations.

Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: While the dimensional accuracy of the intaglio surface of a removable complete denture is key to its adaptation, comfort, and clinical performance, information on the ability of milling and 3D-printing workflows to accurately reproduce this surface is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the trueness of the intaglio surface of milled and 3D-printed removable complete digital dentures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intraoral scans were obtained from 14 participants for a total of 20 edentulous arches. Ten maxillary and 10 mandibular denture bases were then designed and fabricated with a completely digital workflow, both with milling and 3D-printing. Fabricated dentures were digitized with the same intraoral scanner used to obtain intraoral digital scans of the edentulous arches. Standard tessellation language (STL) files of the printed and milled denture bases were used for 3D analysis and comparisons with the STL file of the corresponding designed denture base. Specifically, a reverse engineering software program was used to trim and extract intaglio surfaces, align them, and measure their global mean 3D distance. In order to evaluate the homogeneity of production accuracy of each manufacturing process, the intaglio surfaces were also divided into several regions of interest and the corresponding 3D distances measured. Within- and between-group differences and maxillary and mandibular dentures differences were assessed with parametric and nonparametric tests (α=.05). RESULTS: Milling showed a global better trueness of the entire intaglio surface (-0.002 mm) than 3D-printing (0.018 mm), both for the whole data set (P<.001) and for maxillary (P=.032) or mandibular (P=.049) denture base subgroups. Within each fabrication technology, maxillary (P<.11) and mandibular dentures (P=.2) showed no significant difference in trueness. Measured deviations were significantly different from zero for the 3D-printed dentures (P<.001), but not for the milled dentures (P=.487). Additionally, for milled dentures, no significant difference in trueness was found among the 11 regions of interest identified for the maxillary dentures (P=.085) and the 13 regions of interest for the mandibular dentures (P=.211). Conversely, 3D-printing showed significant variations in trueness among the same zones of interest, both in maxillary (P<.001) and mandibular (P=.004) dentures. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the manufacturing methodologies used for complete dentures, milling can provide a slightly better trueness of the intaglio surface than 3D-printing, with less variation across several zones of interest. However, given the magnitude of such differences, they may be reasonably considered to be of limited, if any, clinical significance.

Survival rates, patient satisfaction, and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: a 12-month prospective study.

PURPOSE: To determine the survival rate, incidence of prosthetic complications, and patient satisfaction of implant fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) after a mean observation period of 1.4 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight (28) eligible participants were recruited according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The definitive metal-acrylic resin IFCDPs consisted of titanium bars veneered with acrylic resin and acrylic denture teeth. Prosthodontic complications, divided into major and minor, were monitored. Parameters such as gender, jaw location, bruxism, and occlusal scheme were evaluated. Moreover, a questionnaire was administered throughout the study to assess patient satisfaction. Poisson regression as well as repeated measures ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen (14) males and 14 females were enrolled and followed-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. All IFCDPs survived (100% survival rate). The most frequent minor complication was the loss of material used to close the screw access hole (20% out of total complications). The most frequent major complication was chipping of the acrylic denture teeth (77.14% out of total complications). Gender (p = 0.008) and bruxism (p = 0.030) were significant predictors for the total major complications (major wear and major chipping) while occlusal scheme was a significant predictor for major chipping events (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: While IFCDPs demonstrated high prosthetic survival rates, they also exhibited a high number of chipping events of the acrylic veneering material, especially in males, bruxers, and individuals with canine guidance occlusion. However, the occurrence of these prosthetic complications did not negatively affect patient satisfaction.

Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of fit of complete-arch printed prosthesis prototypes generated with a digital workflow protocol for completely edentulous jaws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five edentulous jaws (35 patients) underwent intraoral complete-arch digital scans with the double digital scanning (DDS) technique and the generated standard tessellation language (STL) files were superimposed and imported into computer-aided design software. After STL merging, each master STL file was used for printing a prosthesis prototype. The primary outcome was the accuracy of fit assessment of the printed prototypes on verified master stone casts. Two experienced clinicians tested the accuracy of fit with radiographs and screw-resistance tests. Secondary outcomes were the effect of the scan body shape and implant number on the accuracy of fit. RESULTS: Out of the 45 DDS-generated prosthesis prototypes, 39 presented with accurate fit on verified master stone casts, yielding an 86.70% accuracy of fit. Cylindrical scan bodies led to 100% accuracy of fit (25/25), whereas polygonal scan bodies presented with 70% accuracy of fit (14/20). Four implant-supported prostheses yielded 100% accuracy of fit (12/12), compared with 25/29 (86.30%) accuracy of fit for the six-implant-supported ones. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the effect of different scan body shapes (p = 0.005) and implant number on accuracy of fit. Chi-squared test was used to assess the association between the number of implants per arch and the accuracy of fit (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-nine out of 45 complete-arch prosthesis prototypes generated with a completely digital workflow presented with clinically acceptable fit. The effect of the scan body design and implant number was statistically significant, favoring cylindrical scan bodies and four-implant-supported prostheses.

Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in vitro the accuracy of fit of a reference prosthesis seated on three-dimensional (3D) printed casts generated from digital implant scans vs stone casts made by conventional implant impressions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A partially edentulous maxillary master cast with two internal connection implants was generated, while a reference implant-supported prosthesis was fabricated. Conventional splinted open-tray impressions were taken to create stone casts (n = 10) (control group). A digital scan was taken of the master cast using a white light intraoral optical scanner (IOS) (TRIOS, 3Shape), and a Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file was obtained. Four 3D printers were used to print the casts (n = 10 from each 3D printer): Straumann® P30+, Varseo S, Form 3b+and M2 Carbon. Accuracy of fit of the reference prosthesis on all control and test casts was assessed using the screw resistance test and radiographic test. Additionally, all casts were digitized using the same IOS, and the STL files were superimposed to the master cast STL file (reference) to evaluate the 3D accuracy with inspection Geomagic Control software using the root-mean-square (RMS) error. RESULTS: The reference prosthesis presented with clinically acceptable fit on all casts. The highest median RMS error was found in the stone cast group (94.6 µm) while the lowest median was in the M2 Carbon group (46.9 µm). The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001). For post hoc comparisons, Dunn's test with the Holm-Bonferroni correction resulted in a statistically significant difference in four tests, with M2 Carbon exhibiting lower RMS error than the stone cast (p < 0.001) and P30+ (p < 0.001) groups, Form 3b exhibiting lower RMS error than the stone cast (p < 0.001) group, and Varseo S exhibiting lower RMS error than the stone cast (p = 0.006) group. CONCLUSION: Using the screw-resistance test and radiographic assessment, the reference prosthesis fit presented with clinically acceptable accuracy of fit on all casts. Printed casts from 3 different printers demonstrated statistically significant lower 3D deviations than stone casts generated using a conventional implant impression for the present partially edentulous scenario with two implants, but this did not affect prosthesis fit. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Even though there were 3D deviations between the master cast and all control and test casts generated from conventional impressions and digital scans respectively, the reference prosthesis presented with accurate fit on all casts. This indicates that there is a threshold for clinically acceptable accuracy of fit and that 3D-printed casts may be used as definitive master casts to fabricate implant-supported fixed dental prostheses for the partially edentulous anterior maxilla.

Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with the Double Digital Scanning (DDS) Technique: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of fit of milled prosthesis prototypes for completely edentulous patients using a digital workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients received intraoral full-arch digital scans with the double digital scanning (DDS) technique and the generated standard tessellation language (STL) files were superimposed and imported into computer-aided design software (Exocad DentalCAD, exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) for design. After the design, each master STL file was used for computer-aided manufacturing of the prosthesis prototypes through a complete digital workflow. The primary outcome was the accuracy of fit assessment of the digitally fabricated prototypes on verified patient master stone casts. Two blinded clinicians tested the accuracy of fit of the milled prosthesis prototypes on the verified master stone casts utilizing the screw-resistance test and direct observation. RESULTS: Out of the 16 digitally fabricated prototypes from intraoral full-arch digital scans, all 16 presented with an accurate fit on verified master stone casts. CONCLUSIONS: Digitally fabricated full-arch prosthesis prototypes can be generated with a complete digital workflow leading to clinically acceptable fit.

Comparative cost-analysis for removable complete dentures fabricated with conventional, partial, and complete digital workflows.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Comparative cost-analysis related to different manufacturing workflows for removable complete denture fabrication is seldom performed before the adoption of a new technology. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and laboratory costs of removable complete dentures fabricated with a conventional (workflow C), a partial digital (workflow M), and a complete digital (workflow D) workflow and to calculate the break-even points for the implementation of digital technologies in complete denture fabrication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical and laboratory costs for each of the investigated workflows and the manufacturing options related to denture base and denture teeth fabrication were collected from 10 private Italian dental laboratories and clinics. The selected variables included the clinical and laboratory manufacturing time needed to complete each workflow (opportunity cost); costs for materials, labor, packaging, and shipping; and capital and fixed costs for software and hardware, including maintenance fees. The effect of manufacturing workflows and their options on the outcomes of interest was investigated by using generalized estimated equations models (α=.05). Cost minimization and sensitivity analysis were also performed, and break-even points were calculated for the equipment capital costs related to the implementation of workflows M and D. RESULTS: From a laboratory standpoint, workflows M and D and related manufacturing options significantly (P<.001) reduced manufacturing time (5.90 to 6.95 hours and 6.30 to 7.35 hours, respectively), and therefore the opportunity cost of each denture compared with workflow C. Workflow M allowed variable costs savings between 81 and 169 USD, while workflow D allowed for an additional saving of 34 USD. The sensitivity analysis showed that the break-even point related to the capital investment for the equipment needed to implement workflows M and D could be reached, depending on the manufacturing options adopted, between 170 and 933 dentures for workflow M and between 73 and 534 dentures for workflow D. From a clinical standpoint, workflows C and M were almost identical. Conversely, workflow D, which included intraoral scanning, required 1 fewer appointment, saving 0.6 hours of chairside time and about 14 USD for materials compared with M. CONCLUSIONS: Digital workflows (partial and complete digital workflows) were more efficient and cost-effective than the conventional method of fabricating removable complete dentures, with workflow D showing the lowest opportunity and variable costs and break-even point. Savings increased when stock denture teeth were replaced with milled denture teeth and still further with the adoption of 3-dimensionally (3D) printed denture teeth. Milling equipment and materials for denture base fabrication were more expensive than those for 3D-printing. Milling monobloc dentures reduced opportunity and labor costs but increased material cost.

Screw-retained surgical guide for implant placement in terminal dentition patients with existing implants.

For patients with existing implants in need of additional implant placement, the use of the existing implants for guide fixation seems to be a logical alternative. Current options for the fabrication of surgical guides involve creating surgical guides that are mucosa-borne and/or retained by fixation pins. Since these existing techniques involve inherent inaccuracies, the fabrication of surgical guides that are screw-retained at the implant- or abutment-level would eliminate the introduction of those same fundamental inaccuracies. The purpose of the present technical report is to illustrate a step-by-step digitally planned guided implant placement protocol for terminal dentition patients with salvageable existing implants requiring full-arch implant rehabilitation. The advantages of this protocol include enhancing the accuracy of guided implant placement with screw-retention versus the traditional mucosa- or fixation pin support. Thus, this simplifies the transition from failing teeth to implants by ensuring that fixed provisionalization serves both functional and esthetic requirements. This protocol can also predictably reduce chairside time and adjustments at the surgical implant placement appointment.

Digital Workflow in Implant Treatment Planning For Terminal Dentition Patients.

Treatment planning for the transition of patients from terminal dentition to full-arch implant rehabilitation poses challenges. Such challenges pertain to achieving the new orientation of the occlusal and esthetic plane as well as the change of vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO), while the fixed provisionalization using a digital workflow still tends to be considered complex and hard to perform. This article illustrates step-by-step the utilization of a digital workflow protocol in the treatment planning for rehabilitation of terminal dentition patients, simplifying the smile design and ensuring that fixed provisionalization serves both functional and esthetic requirements. This protocol includes facially driven, three-dimensional (3D) digital smile design and chairside mock-up restoration workflows that enable prosthetically driven assessment prior to implant treatment planning and 3D printing of surgical templates and prefabricated interim prostheses, which can predictably reduce chairside time and adjustments at the surgical and fixed provisionalization appointment.

Clinical Evaluation of Pink Esthetic Score of Immediately Impressed Posterior Dental Implants.

PURPOSE: While comparative outcome results for peri-implant crestal bone levels, mucosal margin position, and peri-implant indices have been reported, no studies are available that evaluate and compare the esthetic result of impressions performed immediately at implant placement with that of impressions performed on healed implants. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the pink esthetic score of posterior implants restored with an immediate impression workflow compared to implants restored with a delayed impression workflow. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight eligible participants who had received a single implant crown either in the premolar or molar regions at least 4 months before the study, were identified by an electronic health record review and scheduled for a single-visit study appointment. Esthetic outcomes were measured using the pink esthetic score. Several local- and prosthesis-related factors were recorded and their association with the selected outcome was assessed. Two-sample t-test was used for comparisons between the groups. RESULTS: Pink esthetic score ranged between 4 and 12 (mean: 8). No significant difference between immediate (8.36 ±1.12) and delayed (7.76 ±2.14) impression workflow groups were seen for the total PES (p = 0.25). In addition, individual comparisons between immediately and delayed impressed implants for mesial papilla (1.27 ±0.47; 0.88 ±0.78), distal papilla (0.73 ±0.65; 0.76 ±0.83), tissue margin (1.73 ±0.47; 1.47 ±0.51), tissue contour (1.27 ±0.65; 0.82 ±0.64), alveolar process (0.82 ±0.60; 1.00 ±0.87), color (1.27 ±0.65; 1.29 ±0.69), and texture (1.36 ±0.50; 1.53 ±0.62) did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that the pink esthetic score is not significantly different between single posterior implants impressed with immediate and delayed implant workflows.

Titanium Nitride Coated Implant Abutments: From Technical Aspects And Soft tissue Biocompatibility to Clinical Applications. A Literature Review.

PURPOSE: To review the most up to date scientific evidence concerning the technical implications, soft tissue biocompatibility, and clinical applications derived from the use of titanium nitride hard thin film coatings on titanium alloy implant abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was performed to answer the following focused question: "What is the clinical reliability of nitride coated titanium alloy abutments?". A MEDLINE search between 1980 and 2021 was performed for investigations pertaining to the clinical use of nitride coated titanium alloy implant abutments (TiN) in case reports, case series, and short- and long-term non/randomized controlled clinical trials. Literature analysis led to addition evaluation of research related to the technical and biological aspects, as well as the physicochemical characteristics of TiN hard thin film coatings and their impact on titanium abutment biocompatibility, mechanical properties, macroscopic surface topography, and optical properties. Therefore, preclinical data from biomechanical and in vitro investigations were also considered as inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The limited number of clinical investigations published made a systematic review and meta-analysis not possible, therefore a narrative review was conducted. TiN coatings have been applied to dental materials and instruments to improve their clinical longevity. Implant abutments are coated with titanium nitride to mask the titanium oxide surface and enhance its surface characteristics providing the TiN abutment surface with a low friction coefficient and a very high chemical inertness. TiN coating is suggested to reduce early bacterial colonization and biofilm formation and enhance fibroblast cell proliferation, attachment and adhesion when compared to Ti controls. Additionally, studies indicate that hard thin film coatings enhance the mechanical properties (hardness and wear resistance) of titanium alloy and appears as a yellow color when deposited on the titanium alloy substrate. To date, clinical investigations show that nitride coated titanium abutments provide promising short-term clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Published research on nitride-coated abutments is still limited, however, the available biomedical research, mechanical engineering tests, in vitro investigations, and short-term clinical trials have, to date, reported promising mechanical, biological, and esthetic outcomes.

Esthetic and Functional Rehabilitation of an Adolescent Patient with Severe Dental Fluorosis: A Clinical Report.

Dental fluorosis is a developmental defect affecting amelogenesis. It presents clinically in different forms depending on the concentration, duration, and time of exposure to fluoride. Several therapeutic modalities have been described to manage mild and moderate forms of dental fluorosis; however, limited literature is available on the restorative management of severe forms of dental fluorosis, specifically in young individuals. This clinical report describes a complete prosthodontic rehabilitation of an adolescent patient with severe dental fluorosis affecting his permanent dentition. The patient was treated with a combination of monolithic, minimally-veneered zirconia crowns and direct composite resins. At the 1-year follow-up appointment, there were no complications, and both the patient's oral health and the integrity of the restorations remained stable.

Implant survival and biologic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: An up to 5-year retrospective study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Limited information is available on the association between prosthesis-associated risk factors and biologic complications for patients with implant fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs). PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the implant survival and biologic complications of IFCDPs up to 5 years of follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who had received IFCDPs between August 1, 2009 and August 1, 2014 were identified through an electronic health record review. Those who consented to participate in the study attended a single-visit study appointment. Clinical and radiographic examinations, intraoral photographs, and peri-implant hard and soft tissues parameters were assessed. Only prostheses which could be removed during the study visit were included. Associations between biologic complications and prosthetic factors, such as time with prosthesis in place, prosthesis material, number of implants, cantilever length, and type of prosthesis retention, were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 37 participants (mean ±standard deviation age 62.35 ±10.39 years) with 43 IFCDPs were included. None of the implants had failed, leading to an implant survival of 100% at 5.1 ±2.21 years. Ten of the prostheses were metal-ceramic (Group MC) and 33 were metal-acrylic resin (Group MR). Minor complications were more frequent than major ones. Considering minor complications, peri-implant mucositis was found in 53% of the implant sites, more often in the maxilla (P=.001). The most common major biologic complication was peri-implantitis, which affected 4.0% of the implants, more often in the mandible (P=.025). Peri-implant soft tissue hypertrophy was present 2.79 times more often (95% CI: 1.35 - 5.76, P<.003) around implants supporting metal-acrylic resin prostheses than metal-ceramic ones, with the former type also showing significantly more plaque accumulation (P<.003). CONCLUSIONS: Biologic complications such as soft tissue hypertrophy and plaque accumulation were more often associated with metal-acrylic resin prostheses. Peri-implant mucositis occurred more often under maxillary IFCDPs, while peri-implantitis appeared more common around mandibular implants.